12.22.2024
New Author, Semi-New Narrator, What A World!
Chapters 1 thru 6
I rarely choose books for any reason other than who is narrating them. When searching by narrator I will see different genres of books they have read and that is how I find new books to read. I was familiar with Suzy Jackson from Brandon Sanderson’s Skyward which just really didn’t interest me too much. I haven’t completely given up on it and may go back to it, but I really remember loving Suzy’s work and I am only getting around to seeking out more of it.
Fantasy is not my preferred genre but I have been really trying to branch out from crime novels and learn to enjoy other things. As I mentioned before, fantasy is difficult for me with aphantasia because it’s nearly impossible for me to picture a lot of really wild concepts or completely new things without reference. It ends up being a meaningless experience where I can’t connect well to the story because it’s just a lot of blank spots where you have to imagine things that often aren’t described well enough for me to anchor to them.
I have been trying to find ways of connecting with fantasy novels more and the only way I can is to just try and experience different kinds and see what works. So far, fantasy worlds that are based on the real world with just some magical elements thrown in have really worked well for me.
LightLark drew my attention because it was fantasy and all the books are read by the same narrator which is another thing that can make the difference between a series I will dive into and one I will avoid. I didn’t get very far into LightLark but something stood out to me immediately … the worldbuilding.
I mentioned this before in my reaction to Allison Saft’s A Dark and Drowning Tide; the world she created was so vivid and and clear to me and that aided in my enjoyment of the story. It was … RICH. Alex’s world is not only RICH but it is very unfamiliar to me which you would think, based on everything I have said before, that would be a turn off. Actually, I find it to be a wonderful challenge and it makes it even more interesting to me.
With my aphantasia I can only see things that I have access to in my memory which means when someone says “shark”, I see Jaws … when someone says “clown”, I see Pennywise. I have to have a reference already existing to be able to relate to something that requires imagination. As you can probably imagine, (see what I did there) this means that everything I experience seems very common and not original because it’s technically made up of things I have seen before. It’s rare that something feels fresh and unique to me – it’s rare that I have an experience that I can’t picture or frame in any way.
Alex has managed to create that for me with LightLark so far and it’s a refreshing experience to have. It makes it more difficult for me to connect to it yes, but the world she’s created is so intriguing and so fresh feeling that I am caught up in it. I can see why it’s becoming a movie and I look forward to that because it would be nice to “see” the things that I cannot see in my mind when I’m listening to it.
I think this is also one of the benefits to aphantasia is that when movies are made from books I don’t have that automatic irrational rage-bias towards my own interpretations of the characters … I have none. The characters are blank to me. They have descriptions but there is no face, no imagined version that I created that will be different in the movie. I’m kind of excited to see a movie version of the world and characters Alex has birthed. It’s really so fascinating already.
It’s always a good sign when I can’t wait to go to sleep so I can jump back into a story. I really am looking forward to tonight!
Story this session: 5.0 out of 5.0 stars
Narration: 5.0 out of 5.0 stars